Skip Navigation Links

Project Information

Previous Project 111 of 27,431 Next

THE GAINS FROM SYNCHRONIZING TOP-DOWN AND BOTTOM-UP CONSERVATION ACTIVITIES WITHIN AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPES

Agency:
NIFA

USDA/National Institute of Food and Agriculture

Project Number:
2017-67023-26270
Contact PI / Project Leader:
KROETZ, KAILIN
Awardee Organization:
RESOURCES FOR THE FUTURE INC

Description

Abstract Text:
Recent policies require federal agencies, including the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), to consider ecosystem services when developing policies. As agriculture is the largest land use in the United States, it is crucial to understand ecosystem services within agricultural landscapes. Current and former agricultural land can provide ecosystem services such as habitat, while farming on agricultural land can also benefit from measures on non-farm land resulting in ecosystem services such as lower erosion and healthier soil.In this project we focus on ecosystem services related to biodiversity conservation in agricultural landscapes. Through its conservation and farm programs, the USDA participates in activities that generate conservation benefits and impact the mosaic of land uses across the landscape. Other stakeholders also play a role in defining conservation outcomes in agricultural landscapes. Although these stakeholders operate over a variety of scales, often with differing objectives, the actions of one stakeholder have the potential to impact the goals of other stakeholders.We will develop a framework that incorporates the interactions between bottom-up and top-down stakeholders and processes in agricultural landscapes. The framework will build on the insight that bottom-up stakeholders, including local citizens who make land use decisions and vote on local open-space referenda, respond to the actions of top-down stakeholders, such as the USDA and large conservancies.Focusing on agricultural landscapes with biodiversity value and multiple active stakeholder groups, we will use reserve site selection models to characterize biodiversity conservation benefits of stakeholder activities and panel data methods to estimate the crowding in, or out, of local conservation activities in response to actions of large-scale stakeholders. Using these models we will calculate the ancillary benefit of the major USDA conservation programs (e.g. CRP) taking into account different stakeholder actions when developing a conservation plan. Additionally, we will develop a conservation plan maximizing conservation outcomes assuming coordination of stakeholders such as the USDA, and calculate the efficiency gains from a coordinated response. Our analysis will address USDA's goals of increasing the environmental benefit per program dollar and quantifying the environmental impacts of past program activities.
Project Terms:
Accounting; Address; Agriculture; Biodiversity; Crowding; Data; Ecosystem; Environmental Impact; Farming environment; Goals; Habitats; insight; land use; Measures; Methods; Modeling; Outcome; Play; Policies; Process; programs; response; Role; Services; Site; Soil; United States; United States Department of Agriculture; Voting

Details

Contact PI / Project Leader Information:
Name:  KROETZ, KAILIN
Other PI Information:
SANCHIRICO, JAMES;ARMSWORTH, PAUL
Awardee Organization:
Name:  RESOURCES FOR THE FUTURE INC
City:  WASHINGTON    
Country:  UNITED STATES
Congressional District:
State Code:  DC
District:  00
Other Information:
Fiscal Year: 2016
Award Notice Date:
DUNS Number: 074828427
Project Start Date: 01-Apr-2017
Budget Start Date:
CFDA Code: 10.31
Project End Date: 31-Mar-2019
Budget End Date:
Agency: ?

Agency: The entity responsible for the administering of a research grant, project, or contract. This may represent a federal department, agency, or sub-agency (institute or center). Details on agencies in Federal RePORTER can be found in the FAQ page.

USDA/National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Project Funding Information for 2016:
Year Agency

Agency: The entity responsible for the administering of a research grant, project, or contract. This may represent a federal department, agency, or sub-agency (institute or center). Details on agencies in Federal RePORTER can be found in the FAQ page.

FY Total Cost
2016 NIFA

USDA/National Institute of Food and Agriculture

$499,997

Results

i

It is important to recognize, and consider in any interpretation of Federal RePORTER data, that the publication and patent information cannot be associated with any particular year of a research project. The lag between research being conducted and the availability of its results in a publication or patent award varies substantially. For that reason, it's difficult, if not impossible, to associate a publication or patent with any specific year of the project. Likewise, it is not possible to associate a publication or patent with any particular supplement to a research project or a particular subproject of a multi-project grant.

ABOUT FEDERAL REPORTER RESULTS

Publications: i

Click on the column header to sort the results

PubMed = PubMed PubMed Central = PubMed Central Google Scholar = Google Scholar

Patents: i

Click on the column header to sort the results

Similar Projects

Download Adobe Acrobat Reader:Adobe Acrobat VERSION: 3.29.0 Release Notes
Back to Top