Skip Navigation Links

Project Information

WHICH PALLIATIVE CARE QUALITY MEASURES IMPROVE PATIENT-CENTERED OUTCOMES?

Agency:
AHRQ

HHS/Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

Project Number:
1K08HS023681-01A1
Contact PI / Project Leader:
KAMAL, ARIF
Awardee Organization:
DUKE UNIVERSITY

Description

Abstract Text:
 DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): My career goal is to mature as an independent health services researcher, with a focus on quality and palliative care, to improve the experience of patients with serious and chronic illness and their caregivers. Palliative care is a newer clinical discipline focused on improving quality of life for all patients, independent of prognosis. Palliative care has achieved remarkable growth, with clinical services present in 66% of all hospitals. Despite such growth, a standardized clinical approach does not yet exist. Such an approach requires evaluating which care processes, recommended by published quality measures, improve patient-centered outcomes the most. Then, the care processes and associated quality measures with the greatest impact can be prioritized. We have developed the infrastructure to perform this investigation. Specifically, I led the development of QDACT-PC (Quality Data Collection Tool Palliative Care), a point-of-care, iPad(tm)-based data collection system that simultaneously populates a registry of care processes, quality measure adherence, and patient and health system outcomes. In September 2013, we were awarded an AHRQ R18 grant to implement QDACT-PC nationally in the Palliative Care Research Cooperative Group (PCRC), the first national research collaborative for palliative care. Analysis aims were reserved by my mentor and the PI of that proposal, Dr. Amy Abernethy, for this K08 application. My research goal is to use this quickly growing registry to explore the impact of quality measure adherence on outcomes in the palliative care setting. Under the guidance of my mentors, I will first, I will describe variability in clinician adherence to a set of 20 core palliative care qualiy measures among 1000 patients. Then, I will use quantitative and qualitative methods to determine the relationship between adherence to a set of palliative care quality measures and patient-reported outcomes, including satisfaction with care, quality of life, and symptom relief. Last, I will investigate the relationship between adherence to a set of quality measures and health service utilization, as measured by 30-day readmission rates, length of stay, and overall health care costs. Together, these aims alongside a robust career development plan and dedicated mentorship, will prepare me for an R01-level submission prospectively testing the identified core set on patient-centered outcomes.
Project Terms:
Award; base; career; career development; Caregivers; Caring; Chronic Disease; Clinical; Clinical Services; Compliance behavior; Data Collection; Development; Development Plans; Discipline; experience; Goals; Grant; Growth; Health Care Costs; health care service utilization; Health Services; Health system; Hospitals; improved; Investigation; Length of Stay; Measures; Mentors; Mentorship; Outcome; outcome forecast; Palliative Care; Patient Outcomes Assessments; Patient-Focused Outcomes; Patients; point of care; Process; Publishing; Qualitative Methods; Quality of life; Registries; Research; Research Infrastructure; Research Personnel; satisfaction; Symptoms; System; Testing; tool; United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

Details

Contact PI / Project Leader Information:
Name:  KAMAL, ARIF
Other PI Information:
Not Applicable
Awardee Organization:
Name:  DUKE UNIVERSITY
City:  DURHAM    
Country:  UNITED STATES
Congressional District:
State Code:  NC
District:  01
Other Information:
Fiscal Year: 2015
Award Notice Date: 15-Sep-2015
DUNS Number: 044387793
Project Start Date: 30-Sep-2015
Budget Start Date: 30-Sep-2015
CFDA Code: 226
Project End Date: 29-Sep-2020
Budget End Date: 29-Sep-2016
Agency: ?

Agency: The entity responsible for the administering of a research grant, project, or contract. This may represent a federal department, agency, or sub-agency (institute or center). Details on agencies in Federal RePORTER can be found in the FAQ page.

HHS/Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Project Funding Information for 2015:
Year Agency

Agency: The entity responsible for the administering of a research grant, project, or contract. This may represent a federal department, agency, or sub-agency (institute or center). Details on agencies in Federal RePORTER can be found in the FAQ page.

FY Total Cost
2015 AHRQ

HHS/Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

$146,739

Results

i

It is important to recognize, and consider in any interpretation of Federal RePORTER data, that the publication and patent information cannot be associated with any particular year of a research project. The lag between research being conducted and the availability of its results in a publication or patent award varies substantially. For that reason, it's difficult, if not impossible, to associate a publication or patent with any specific year of the project. Likewise, it is not possible to associate a publication or patent with any particular supplement to a research project or a particular subproject of a multi-project grant.

ABOUT FEDERAL REPORTER RESULTS

Publications: i

Click on the column header to sort the results

PubMed = PubMed PubMed Central = PubMed Central Google Scholar = Google Scholar

Patents: i

Click on the column header to sort the results

Similar Projects

Download Adobe Acrobat Reader:Adobe Acrobat VERSION: 3.41.0 Release Notes
Back to Top