Skip Navigation Links

Project Information



HHS/Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

Project Number:
Contact PI / Project Leader:
Awardee Organization:


Abstract Text:
DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): The quality of surgical care varies widely in the United States, and identifying appropriate quality indicators is essential. Our current paradigm of quality assessment in surgery primarily focuses on clinical outcomes, such as complication rates, mortality, and readmission. This approach effectively captures perioperative safety and technical performance, but overlooks the patient perspective. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs), such as self-reported health status, function, and quality of life, could offer a more complete assessment of quality. However, little is known about their potential as a quality metric. This proposal will explore the determinants of variation in PROs at the hospital and surgeon level, their advantages and limitations as an indicator of quality, and their value and application for patients considering surgery. In addition to the innovative research plan, this proposal will provide the career development candidate (Dr. Jennifer Waljee) with a rich methodological training and mentorship experience. The research proposal focuses specifically on the variation of PROs at the population level for four surgical conditions: bariatric, urologic, wrist, and spine surgery. These conditions were chosen from the regional surgical collaborative quality improvement programs led by the University of Michigan at the Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy with funding from the Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan/Blue Care Network. Each of these collaborative programs gathers clinical and patient-reported data from patients undergoing surgery from each participating hospital, and is a unique clinical laboratory to study PROs across hospitals and surgeons on a population-based level. The proposal's research aims include (1) examining the variation in PROs across hospitals and surgeons, and the patient, surgeon, and hospital-level factors that drive this variation; (2) the extent to which PROs are independent measures of quality compared with clinical outcomes; and (3) the way in which patients might use PROs in conjunction with clinical outcomes as measures of hospital and surgeon performance. This project, the multidisciplinary mentorship team, and the research environment are ideally suited to address the career goals and educational needs of Dr. Waljee. Her prior research experience examining PROs following surgery has prepared her to conduct the work outlined in this proposal. However, to achieve her career goal of improving quality assessment in surgery by integrating patient reported outcomes as performance measures, she will need additional training. Her educational goals, including obtaining expertise in survey research, advanced statistical methods for comparing provider performance, and approaches to healthcare organization and policy, are feasible with the grant's educational plan and highly accomplished mentorship team. This proposal includes graduate-level courses in each educational component as well as interactive research seminars and one-on-one mentorship through project-based learning. In summary, this research project, mentorship team, and educational plan will lay the groundwork for Dr. Waljee to perform ongoing and innovative research to improve quality assessment in surgery, and mature as an independent surgeon scientist.
Project Terms:
Address; Bariatrics; base; Blue Cross; Blue Shield; career; career development; Caring; Clinical; Complication; Data Reporting; Educational Grants; Environment; experience; Funding; Goals; Health Status; Healthcare; Hospitals; improved; innovation; Laboratories; Learning; Measures; Mentorship; Metric; Michigan; multidisciplinary; Operative Surgical Procedures; Outcome; Patient Outcomes Assessments; Patient Self-Report; Patients; Performance; Perioperative; Policies; Population; population based; programs; Provider; Quality Indicator; Quality of life; Research; Research Project Summaries; Research Proposals; Safety; Scientist; Statistical Methods; Surgeon; Surveys; Training; United States; Universities; urologic; Variant; Vertebral column; Work; Wrist


Contact PI / Project Leader Information:
Other PI Information:
Not Applicable
Awardee Organization:
City:  ANN ARBOR    
Congressional District:
State Code:  MI
District:  12
Other Information:
Fiscal Year: 2014
Award Notice Date: 12-Sep-2014
DUNS Number: 073133571
Project Start Date: 30-Sep-2014
Budget Start Date: 30-Sep-2014
CFDA Code: 226
Project End Date: 29-Sep-2018
Budget End Date: 29-Sep-2015
Agency: ?

Agency: The entity responsible for the administering of a research grant, project, or contract. This may represent a federal department, agency, or sub-agency (institute or center). Details on agencies in Federal RePORTER can be found in the FAQ page.

HHS/Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Project Funding Information for 2014:
Year Agency

Agency: The entity responsible for the administering of a research grant, project, or contract. This may represent a federal department, agency, or sub-agency (institute or center). Details on agencies in Federal RePORTER can be found in the FAQ page.

FY Total Cost
2014 AHRQ

HHS/Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality




It is important to recognize, and consider in any interpretation of Federal RePORTER data, that the publication and patent information cannot be associated with any particular year of a research project. The lag between research being conducted and the availability of its results in a publication or patent award varies substantially. For that reason, it's difficult, if not impossible, to associate a publication or patent with any specific year of the project. Likewise, it is not possible to associate a publication or patent with any particular supplement to a research project or a particular subproject of a multi-project grant.


Publications: i

Click on the column header to sort the results

PubMed = PubMed PubMed Central = PubMed Central Google Scholar = Google Scholar

Patents: i

Click on the column header to sort the results

Similar Projects

Download Adobe Acrobat Reader:Adobe Acrobat VERSION: 3.41.0 Release Notes
Back to Top