Skip Navigation Links

Project Information

EMERGING RESEARCH-EMPIRICAL--PROVING STYLES IN UNIVERSITY MATHEMATICS

Agency:
NSF

National Science Foundation

Project Number:
1008641
Contact PI / Project Leader:
MEJIA-RAMOS, JUAN PABLO
Awardee Organization:
RUTGERS THE ST UNIV OF NJ NEW BRUNSWICK

Description

Abstract Text:
This empirical research project is developing an instrument to measure students' reasoning styles when constructing proofs and applying it to test on a large scale the hypotheses that undergraduate students are consistent in their proving style and can be successful in mathematics regardless of style. Three research questions will be answered:

1. To what extent do undergraduate mathematics majors show a consistency in their reasoning on proof production tasks?

2. What is the distribution of students according to the extent to which they employ these strategies when attempting to construct a proof of a given statement?

3. What is the relationship between undergraduates' reasoning styles and their general mathematical ability, their general thinking style, and their academic success?

The work is being performed by a research team at Rutgers University New Brunswick and Montclair State University.

The proving styles for the individual students will be identified from analysis of their responses to an instrument that calls for proofs of 18 statements from calculus and linear algebra specifically selected to distinguish proving styles. The research questions will be answered by administering the instrument along with a measure of general reasoning style to 100 undergraduate mathematics majors. Participants are videotaped and asked to think aloud when solving half of the items on the proof instrument. Regression analyses are used to study the relationship between performance on proving style, general reasoning style, and mathematics SAT scores. Cluster analyses are used to sort students by general reasoning styles and then an ANOVA is used to see if clusters vary in proving styles.

The final product from the proposed work will be a reliable and valid instrument to detect approaches to proof. Such an instrument has the potential to help broaden how teachers of mathematics at the college level view students' understanding of proof. Such a broadened perspective could lead to a change in how proof is taught and make higher mathematics more accessible to a larger group of college students.
Project Terms:
Calculi; Cluster Analysis; college; Educational process of instructing; Empirical Research; Individual; instrument; Lead; mathematical ability; Mathematics; Measures; New Brunswick; Participant; Performance; Production; Regression Analysis; Research; Research Project Grants; response; Sorting - Cell Movement; Students; success; teacher; Testing; Universities; university student; Videotape; Work

Details

Contact PI / Project Leader Information:
Name:  MEJIA-RAMOS, JUAN PABLO
Other PI Information:
FULLER, EVAN; TORRE, JIMMY DE LA; WEBER, KEITH
Awardee Organization:
Name:  RUTGERS THE ST UNIV OF NJ NEW BRUNSWICK
City:  NEW BRUNSWICK    
Country:  UNITED STATES
Congressional District:
State Code:  NJ
District:  06
Other Information:
Fiscal Year: 2010
Award Notice Date: 22-Aug-2010
DUNS Number: 001912864
Project Start Date: 01-Sep-2010
Budget Start Date:
CFDA Code: 47.076
Project End Date: 31-Aug-2011
Budget End Date:
Agency: ?

Agency: The entity responsible for the administering of a research grant, project, or contract. This may represent a federal department, agency, or sub-agency (institute or center). Details on agencies in Federal RePORTER can be found in the FAQ page.

National Science Foundation
Project Funding Information for 2010:
Year Agency

Agency: The entity responsible for the administering of a research grant, project, or contract. This may represent a federal department, agency, or sub-agency (institute or center). Details on agencies in Federal RePORTER can be found in the FAQ page.

FY Total Cost
2010 NSF

National Science Foundation

$77,987

Results

i

It is important to recognize, and consider in any interpretation of Federal RePORTER data, that the publication and patent information cannot be associated with any particular year of a research project. The lag between research being conducted and the availability of its results in a publication or patent award varies substantially. For that reason, it's difficult, if not impossible, to associate a publication or patent with any specific year of the project. Likewise, it is not possible to associate a publication or patent with any particular supplement to a research project or a particular subproject of a multi-project grant.

ABOUT FEDERAL REPORTER RESULTS

Publications: i

Click on the column header to sort the results

PubMed = PubMed PubMed Central = PubMed Central Google Scholar = Google Scholar

Patents: i

Click on the column header to sort the results

Similar Projects

Download Adobe Acrobat Reader:Adobe Acrobat VERSION: 3.41.0 Release Notes
Back to Top