Skip Navigation Links

Project Information



National Science Foundation

Project Number:
Contact PI / Project Leader:
Awardee Organization:


Abstract Text:
Retaining STEM teachers is a challenge across the Nation. This Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program Track 4 project seeks to investigate factors that affect retention of novice science teachers throughout the first five years of their career. The project will pay particular attention to understanding the ways in which school districts design and implement mentoring and induction programs that demonstrate success in retaining teachers. The study will include examination of retention rates of science teachers in high-need schools, science teachers of color, and retention of Noyce Scholarship teacher recipients. In the United States, significant resources are devoted to recruitment and preparation of science teachers, yet the mentoring and induction experiences that may contribute positively to science teacher retention are poorly understood. A better understanding of evidence-based practices for designing mentoring and induction experiences for new science teachers could have clear implications for both policy and practice. This study will use state level data, spanning a ten-year period, from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and North Carolina, to identify school districts with exemplary novice science teacher retention, and then conduct site visits and write case studies that describe the characteristics that contribute to the high retention of science teachers in these districts.This study has two phases. In the first phase, researchers will examine publicly available staffing data to develop a 5-year retention map for three cohorts of teachers in each state, with additional cohorts tracked over the duration of the study. This staffing data from each state will be used to map the career paths of individual science teachers for a more comprehensive picture of teacher retention, mobility, and attrition. By identifying districts that are highly successful in retaining science teachers, the findings from this analysis will be used to set the stage for the second phase of the research. In the second phase, the researchers aim to closely examine a subset of districts that demonstrate high science teacher retention rates. This analysis focuses on gaining a better understanding of the role of mentoring and induction programs, as well as other factors cited in the literature that may influence teacher retention. This project uses a theoretical framework, based in research literature, that looks at teacher retention in terms school contexts and personal/professional backgrounds. One state study will occur in each of years two through five of the project, beginning with New Jersey in the second project year. A subset of districts that are successful at retaining science teachers of color, science teachers in high-need districts, and Noyce graduates teaching science will be identified for further study. It is estimated that a sample of 15-20 school districts per each of the four states will be identified, with the aim of representing the range of district characteristics, and mentoring and induction programs. From these districts, the research team will select five to six exemplar districts for case studies that will address the best practices, structure and organization, funding, and critical issues in each district related to the mentoring and induction program. Anticipated outcomes of this study include: state-specific reports on the role of mentoring and induction and other retention-related factors for dissemination (through policy briefs, conference presentations, peer-reviewed manuscripts, and a multiple-case study in the form of a book-length manuscript featuring generalizable best practices in mentoring and induction, as well as other factors influencing retention), and the production and dissemination of a shareable database analysis tool for calculating actual retention rates (disaggregated by teaching certification) from existing staffing data sets. The potential contributions of this study include the dissemination of knowledge about how to better support novice science teachers so that they remain in the profession. Further, this study will provide all states with a set of tools by which actual retention rates can be measured.This award reflects NSF's statutory mission and has been deemed worthy of support through evaluation using the Foundation's intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria.
Project Terms:
Address; Affect; Attention; Award; base; Books; career; Career Choice; Case Study; Certification; Characteristics; cohort; Color; Data; Data Set; Databases; design; Educational process of instructing; Evaluation; Evidence based practice; experience; Foundations; Funding; high needs schools; Individual; Knowledge; Learning; Length; Literature; Manuscripts; Maps; Measures; Mentors; Mission; Names; New Jersey; North Carolina; Outcome Study; Peer Review; Pennsylvania; Phase; Policies; Preparation; Production; programs; recruit; Reporting; Research; Research Personnel; Resources; retention rate; Role; Sampling; school district; Schools; Science; science teacher; Site Visit; Structure; success; symposium; teacher; tool; United States; Wisconsin; Writing


Contact PI / Project Leader Information:
Other PI Information:
Awardee Organization:
City:  MONTCLAIR    
Congressional District:
State Code:  NJ
District:  11
Other Information:
Fiscal Year: 2018
Award Notice Date: 14-Aug-2018
DUNS Number: 053506184
Project Start Date: 15-Aug-2018
Budget Start Date:
CFDA Code: 47.076
Project End Date: 31-Jul-2023
Budget End Date:
Agency: ?

Agency: The entity responsible for the administering of a research grant, project, or contract. This may represent a federal department, agency, or sub-agency (institute or center). Details on agencies in Federal RePORTER can be found in the FAQ page.

National Science Foundation
Project Funding Information for 2018:
Year Agency

Agency: The entity responsible for the administering of a research grant, project, or contract. This may represent a federal department, agency, or sub-agency (institute or center). Details on agencies in Federal RePORTER can be found in the FAQ page.

FY Total Cost
2018 NSF

National Science Foundation




It is important to recognize, and consider in any interpretation of Federal RePORTER data, that the publication and patent information cannot be associated with any particular year of a research project. The lag between research being conducted and the availability of its results in a publication or patent award varies substantially. For that reason, it's difficult, if not impossible, to associate a publication or patent with any specific year of the project. Likewise, it is not possible to associate a publication or patent with any particular supplement to a research project or a particular subproject of a multi-project grant.


Publications: i

Click on the column header to sort the results

PubMed = PubMed PubMed Central = PubMed Central Google Scholar = Google Scholar

Patents: i

Click on the column header to sort the results

Similar Projects

Download Adobe Acrobat Reader:Adobe Acrobat VERSION: 3.41.0 Release Notes
Back to Top